{"id":3296,"date":"2016-02-17T12:35:28","date_gmt":"2016-02-17T12:35:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.beer-syndicate.com\/blog\/?p=3296"},"modified":"2017-05-03T00:42:24","modified_gmt":"2017-05-03T00:42:24","slug":"how-beer-saved-the-world-the-mystery-of-antibiotic-beer-revisited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/beersyndicate.com\/blog\/how-beer-saved-the-world-the-mystery-of-antibiotic-beer-revisited\/","title":{"rendered":"How Beer Saved the World: The Mystery of Antibiotic Beer Revisited"},"content":{"rendered":"

Back in 2011, the Discovery Channel aired the beer documentary How Beer Saved the World<\/em> (transcript here<\/a><\/span>), a film that took a look at the origins of beer and also built a case for (spoiler alert) how beer saved the world.<\/span><\/p>\n

The film fired off one fascinating beer fact after another like how beer was responsible for the start of the agricultural revolution in 9,000 B.C., or how beer built the pyramids of ancient Egypt, saved millions of lives in the Middle Ages, and how beer was to thank for inventions like the wheel, writing, math, and modern medicine, just to name a few.<\/span><\/p>\n

No doubt, the documentary boasted many a bold claim, but as a beer brewer, I was interested in one claim in particular: a significant amount of tetracycline, a broad-spectrum antibiotic, was discovered in 3,000 year-old Egyptian bones, and the source of that tetracycline was from an ancient beer recipe.<\/span><\/p>\n

The idea that a modern-day wonder drug like tetracycline was found in 3,000 year-old bones might seem unusual especially considering that tetracycline wasn\u2019t officially discovered and produced by science until 1945 by Benjamin Minge Duggar.\u00a01<\/span><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

But sure enough, Dr. George Armelagos, Professor of Anthropology at Emory University, proved conclusively that there was no mistake; tetracycline was in ancient bones, and in large quantities.<\/span><\/p>\n

To be clear though, Armelagos was originally testing Sudanese Nubian and Egyptian bones dated between 350 A.D and 550 A.D., and later bones from a Jordanian site dating to the 2nd<\/sup><\/span> century B.C., not 3,000 year-old Egyptian bones.\u00a02 \u00a0<\/span><\/sup><\/span>Nevertheless, indirect evidence suggests\u00a0that tetracycline could be found in Egyptian bones going as far back to\u00a0pre-dynastic (pre-Pharaoh) Egypt (6,000 B.C \u2013 3,100 B.C.).\u00a03<\/sup><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Now, the curious story\u00a0of how\u00a0tetracycline was found in an\u00a0ancient Nubian bone goes like this:<\/span><\/p>\n

Around 1980, Debra Martin, a grad student of biological anthropology at the University of Massachusetts, was learning how to make thin sections of archaeological bones while visiting a research laboratory at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, Michigan.\u00a0 After manually grinding down a bone fragment from a 4th<\/sup><\/span> century ancient Nubian mummy, Martin was preparing to view it under a standard microscope, but only a\u00a0UV microscope was\u00a0available.<\/span><\/p>\n

Coincidentally, researchers in this particular lab were using tetracycline to measure the rate of bone formation because t<\/span>etracycline tends to bind to calcium and phosphorus in growing bones and will emit a yellow-green fluorescence when exposed to UV light at the 490-nanometer wavelength.\u00a04<\/sup><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Remarkably, when Martin looked at this ancient bone section under the UV microscope, it was emitting a yellow-green fluorescence, just like tetracycline.<\/span><\/p>\n

Martin returned to the University of Massachusetts where she told Dr. Armelagos about her discovery, and in the fall of 1980, Armelagos, Martin and three other colleagues published their findings.\u00a05<\/sup><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

But Armelagos and his colleagues\u2019 work was met with skepticism, so in 2010, he teamed up with medicinal chemist Mark Nelson and after using hydrogen fluoride to first dissolve the bones, they then extracted and finally positively identified the tetracycline through chemical analysis.\u00a0 No question, tetracycline was definitively in the bones.<\/span><\/p>\n

Of course the real kicker was that the levels of tetracycline extracted from the bones were so high\u00a0it suggested that the ancient Nubians and Egyptians were consuming the antibiotic on a regular basis beginning in early childhood and on into old age.\u00a06<\/sup><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Searching for the source of the tetracycline, Armelagos recreated many ancient recipes to no avail.\u00a0 That was until he finally came across an ancient beer recipe from around that time, brewed it, and, lo and behold, the beer contained significant enough levels of tetracycline to be considered a likely candidate for the source of the antibiotic.<\/span><\/p>\n

And Now, the Rest of the Story<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Of course the documentary How Beer Saved the World<\/em> left one big fat mystery sitting on the table: what the heck was going on with that ancient beer recipe that it not only produced antibiotics, but produced the antibiotics in such large amounts?<\/span><\/p>\n

And here\u2019s a scary thought: if ancient brewers were somehow introducing antibiotics into their beer, is it possible that brewers today are doing the same thing and pumping us all full of tetracycline?<\/span><\/p>\n

Sure, a steady intake of antibiotics might keep us healthy in the short term, but ultimately it could also contribute to the increase of deadly antibiotic-resistant superbugs that might one day wipe mankind off the face of the Earth leading to a follow-up documentary: How Beer Destroyed the World<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n

But before you call the FDA, let\u2019s examine the facts.<\/span><\/p>\n

Like modern beer, the ancient antibiotic beer was made with grain. Naturally occurring tetracycline is produced by mold-like (spore-forming) bacteria called Streptomyces, which is common in soil and decaying vegetation, especially in warm arid regions like in ancient Nubia.\u00a0 If these antibiotic-producing bacteria were to come into contact with grain, and that grain was then used to make beer, tetracycline would be in the final product.<\/span><\/p>\n

Dr. Armelagos believes that the grains used to make the ancient beer were likely stored in mud bins, and because Streptomyces is commonly found in soil, the grains would have come into contact with the Streptomyces from the mud bins.<\/span><\/p>\n

Now, even though modern grain is frequently covered with bacteria, it is normally stored in steel silos, not in mud bins.\u00a0 This reduces the likelihood that modern beer would contain significant amounts of tetracycline.<\/span><\/p>\n

But the mud bin theory only explains how the grain could have been contaminated, not how it was able to produce so much tetracycline.<\/span><\/p>\n

For example, when grain covered with the antibiotic-producing bacteria was tested, there were only minimal amounts of tetracycline detected— not nearly the amount that was found in those almost\u00a02,000 year-old bones.\u00a0 So what gives?<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Well, as Emily Sohn pointed out<\/a><\/span>, \u201conly when people fermented the grain would tetracycline production explode.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

But that explanation might leave some brewers scratching their heads, and here\u2019s why: dead bacteria (Streptomyces) don\u2019t produce tetracycline.\u00a0 Allow me to clarify.<\/span><\/p>\n

When making beer, malted grains are first soaked in hot water for about an hour.\u00a0 That hot water extracts sugars from the grain.\u00a0 The grain is then removed, leaving behind a kind of sugar water that brewers call \u201cwort\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

After that, the wort is typically boiled for an hour or more, and then cooled.\u00a0 Boiling the wort is key here because the boiling temperature would kill most bacteria, including Streptomyces.\u00a0 It\u2019s only after the wort is boiled and cooled that primary fermentation takes place.<\/span><\/p>\n

In other words, if the Streptomyces bacteria are killed off during the boil, they wouldn\u2019t survive to create any<\/u> tetracycline during fermentation, certainly not the kind of levels of tetracycline found in those ancient bones.<\/span><\/p>\n

You might then wonder how any<\/u> tetracycline could be found in beer after Streptomyces-contaminated grain was boiled.\u00a0 The reason that at least small amounts of tetracycline could remain after being boiled is because tetracycline doesn\u2019t fully decompose<\/a><\/span> until about 338 \u00b0F (170 \u00b0C), and boiling temperature is about 210 \u00b0F (100 \u00b0C). \u00a0Even pasteurization only seems to minimally reduce tetracycline levels<\/a><\/span> by about 5-6%.\u00a07<\/sup><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

So, yes, tetracycline could survive the boil, but the Streptomyces bacteria couldn\u2019t.\u00a0 And we need that Streptomyces bacteria alive and well to make it to the fermentation process in order to produce the amounts of tetracycline found in those ancient bones.<\/span><\/p>\n

Oh well- so much for our ancient antibiotic beer. \u00a0Eh<\/em>, except for the fact that Dr. Armelagos and his colleagues were able to reproduce the ancient beer which was teeming with tetracycline, and he\u2019s even had some of his student do it too.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Secret Formula for Antibiotic Beer<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\"Antibiotic<\/p>\n

The first thing you should know about ancient Egyptian beer recipes is that they are not exactly similar to how most beer is typically brewed today.\u00a0 For example, the process for making Egyptian beer<\/a><\/span> generally began first by making bread, which probably would have been made from emmer (a kind of wheat), spelt or barely grains, and there is evidence<\/span> to suggest that the grains were malted<\/a><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

In order to make the bread for an\u00a0antibiotic beer the way the ancient Egyptians and Nubians seem to have done it, the Streptomyces-contaminated grain would go through a malting process which first begins by germinating the grain.<\/span><\/p>\n

Anthropology student Amanda Mummert<\/a><\/span> who assisted Dr. Armelagos in his research described the germination procedure like this: \u201cThis process is much like how you would do in a fourth-grade germination science project, where the grains would be soaked in water for about 24 hours, drained and then laid between sheets of cloth until they sprouted.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Germinating the grain causes the starch inside the grain to be converted into sugars by enzymes which conveniently reside within the grain itself.\u00a0 The grain is eventually dried out which stops the germination process, otherwise the sprouting plant would use up the starches and sugars in the grain needed to make beer. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The dried grain is now called malt and contains the sugars that are important for making\u00a0antibiotic beer.\u00a0 Those sugars are important because they become a food source for the Streptomyces coating the grain to metabolize and convert into tetracycline.<\/span><\/p>\n

After the grain was dried, it was milled into flour and mixed with water to create dough.\u00a0 That dough was then left to rise which likely occurred as a result of exposure to naturally occurring yeast in the air.\u00a0 During this time, the Streptomyces that was on the grain could produce even more tetracycline from the sugars in the fermenting dough.<\/span><\/p>\n

The dough was then made into partially baked bread, and that bread was later tossed into water and allowed to ferment into beer. \u00a0Even modern beer recipes of villagers along the Nile today brew beer in this way,\u00a08<\/sup><\/span>\u00a0<\/sup><\/span>and at least one ancient recipe<\/a><\/span> called for taking three loaves of bread, breaking each piece up into quarters, and placing them\u00a0into one crock to ferment. (By the way, fermentation is the process by which yeast consumes sugars and converts them into alcohol and CO2, which transforms our bready mush into beer.)<\/span><\/p>\n

Even if the all of the Streptomyces would have been destroyed as a result of baking the bread, the tetracycline<\/em> would have already been produced and been present in bread and any beer made from bread that used\u00a0Streptomyces-contaminated grain.\u00a0 However, Dr. Armelagos notes that the tetracycline bread was added to a broth of milled Streptomyces-contaminated malt, which would have further increased both the alcohol and tetracycline content.<\/span><\/p>\n

In fact, Armelagos\u2019 team preformed two experiments: one in which Streptomyces was added to the dough, and one where Streptomyces was added only to the malt broth.\u00a0 The latter proved more successful, producing significant amounts of tetracycline.<\/span><\/p>\n

The resulting \u201cbeer\u201d may have been strained away from the mushy bread gruel, or simply consumed together in a bowl like a mildly alcoholic lumpy, beer-y soup.<\/span><\/p>\n

So, as it turns out, the key to making ancient antibiotic beer is the presence of live Streptomyces bacteria during fermentation.\u00a0 And if one were trying to introduce Streptomyces into beer or bread today (for scientific purposes), it is certainly possible to find the naturally occurring antibiotic-producing bacteria under certain conditions.\u00a0 However, one could also probably just buy a pure culture of Streptomyces online and add it along with yeast early in the fermentation process (although personally, I generally prefer my beer antibiotic-free).<\/span><\/p>\n

Final Comments<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Although the ancient Egyptians and Nubians probably didn\u2019t fully understand the science behind how antibiotics were being produced in their bread and beer, it does seem that they were aware of the medicinal benefits of such tetracycline-laced beer and used it as a mouth wash to treat diseases of the gums, as a dressing for wounds, as an enema, vaginal douche, and as Armelagos points out, as an anal fumigant where remaining\u00a0dried\u00a0grains were burned to create a smoke to treat diseases of the anus (your mileage may vary).\u00a09<\/sup><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

And finally, you may have wondered what were the effects of prolonged regular exposure to antibiotics for the ancient Egyptians and Nubians. Did it create a superbug that ended their cultures?\u00a0 Well, Dr. Armelagos\u2019 team wondered the same thing. \u201cTo test this, we have examined the bones in our sample for signs of periosteal reactions— roughened surfaces that form as a result of bone infection.\u00a0 We have found no evidence that infections became more intense during the centuries represented by the bones, as would be expected if more resistant bacteria had evolved.\u201d\u00a010<\/sup><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

To echo the late Paul Harvey: and now you know the rest of the story.<\/span><\/p>\n

Cheers!<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Tweet<\/a>
\n